EverettsTheoryOfEvolution
02-28-2007, 09:14 PM
It seems Beckett is the topic of discussion in 2 or 3 different threads right now, and I was thinking it would be nice to have a discussion just on him. It seems to me his success or failure could be a major factor in the amount of success the sox have over the next few years.
I was checking his stats over at http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=510&position=P
Some things I noticed:
No matter what the reason, 2006 was a statistical anomaly. Some of his stats are so far out of line (ERA, HR, K/9) that they can't be seen as a normal deviation, or predictable decline. Does this indicate a likely bounce back season, or has something "happened" to him?
The good things, though - in 2006 he threw more innings (204.2) than any other season in his career. He also had his highest win total, despite obviously slumping in certain areas. I know not much stock is placed in win totals, but I think it is at least somewhat significant here - the same pitcher in the same system against very similar competition can be expected to have a similar win total. If your number 2-3 pitcher can get 16 wins in a bad season, at a cost of 9 to 13 million, is he really all that bad? (my take: for the season, you're doing good, but you're not set up for post-season play).
I'm not a stat head, so I haven't done an exhaustive analysis by any means - I really just wanted to open the door for some discussion.
I was checking his stats over at http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=510&position=P
Some things I noticed:
No matter what the reason, 2006 was a statistical anomaly. Some of his stats are so far out of line (ERA, HR, K/9) that they can't be seen as a normal deviation, or predictable decline. Does this indicate a likely bounce back season, or has something "happened" to him?
The good things, though - in 2006 he threw more innings (204.2) than any other season in his career. He also had his highest win total, despite obviously slumping in certain areas. I know not much stock is placed in win totals, but I think it is at least somewhat significant here - the same pitcher in the same system against very similar competition can be expected to have a similar win total. If your number 2-3 pitcher can get 16 wins in a bad season, at a cost of 9 to 13 million, is he really all that bad? (my take: for the season, you're doing good, but you're not set up for post-season play).
I'm not a stat head, so I haven't done an exhaustive analysis by any means - I really just wanted to open the door for some discussion.